"Today, my ACLU connection would probably disqualify me," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg told students at a lecture series at Southern Methodist University’s law school. Before being nominated to the court in 1993 by Clinton (and confirmed 96-3), Ginsburg had spent time working as the Director of the ACLU’s Women’s Right Project. These days, she says, her work as a women’s rights attorney for the civil rights organization would prevent her from being confirmed by this Senate. 
ThinkProgress calls her “single most important women’s rights attorney in American history” for her work with the ACLU. She was instrumental, as they note, in two particular cases: Reed v Reed and Craig v Boren. The first case marked the first instance in which SCOTUS ruled that the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment applied to women. The second case resulted in a ruling declaring that gender discrimation laws “were subject to heightened constitutional scrutiny.” Her role in gender quality under the law in the United States has been unparalleled and indispensable. And that would probably mean that she would not be confirmed today.
Above: Via ThinkProgress, Ginsburg during her time with the ACLU.

"Today, my ACLU connection would probably disqualify me," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg told students at a lecture series at Southern Methodist University’s law school. Before being nominated to the court in 1993 by Clinton (and confirmed 96-3), Ginsburg had spent time working as the Director of the ACLU’s Women’s Right Project. These days, she says, her work as a women’s rights attorney for the civil rights organization would prevent her from being confirmed by this Senate. 

ThinkProgress calls her “single most important women’s rights attorney in American history” for her work with the ACLU. She was instrumental, as they note, in two particular cases: Reed v Reed and Craig v Boren. The first case marked the first instance in which SCOTUS ruled that the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment applied to women. The second case resulted in a ruling declaring that gender discrimation laws “were subject to heightened constitutional scrutiny.” Her role in gender quality under the law in the United States has been unparalleled and indispensable. And that would probably mean that she would not be confirmed today.

Above: Via ThinkProgress, Ginsburg during her time with the ACLU.

348 notes

Show

  1. cassiestrange reblogged this from fuckyeahfeministartandliterature
  2. porcelain-horse-horselain reblogged this from thepoliticalnotebook
  3. fraisestagada reblogged this from fuckyeahfiercebitches
  4. cingulata reblogged this from fuckyeahfeministartandliterature
  5. silas216 reblogged this from dendroica
  6. tsfixe reblogged this from aloofshahbanou
  7. kbutno reblogged this from prettyredballoon
  8. jojoholmes reblogged this from loveyourchaos
  9. veruca-assault reblogged this from seriouslyamerica
  10. holden421 reblogged this from seriouslyamerica
  11. seriouslyamerica reblogged this from thelunaticyouarelookingfor
  12. dendroica reblogged this from neonstorm
  13. neonstorm reblogged this from loveyourchaos
  14. wut4 reblogged this from piddlebucket
  15. trashera reblogged this from thechargingsky
  16. piddlebucket reblogged this from feistyfeminist
  17. nidya-sarria reblogged this from thingssheloves
  18. leechcraft reblogged this from fuckyeahfiercebitches
  19. wormsinmyroses reblogged this from thingssheloves
  20. momosaur-rex reblogged this from thingssheloves
  21. miumiumiao reblogged this from thingssheloves
  22. aimmyarrowshigh reblogged this from thingssheloves
  23. thingssheloves reblogged this from loveyourchaos

Blog comments powered by Disqus

']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(ga); })(); // ]]>